Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 11, 2024 20:23:48 GMT -8
Provide appropriate decision-making for the species under consideration. By doing so, the judge will be closer to the real truth, making error less likely. In particular, the exercise of putting yourself in the shoes of the defendant or the person being sued and the adverse party, as they are, is useful. This way, you will be able to see the process in three dimensions, better understanding its extent. In the last item, the fourth , comes respect for the inescapable legal principles, more precisely the constitutional ones, also enshrined in article 36, of Resolution 1,541/98. They are, bearing in mind the judicialiform nature of the administrative procedure: 1st. That of the natural judge , in the “lato sensu” sense article.
The Federal Constitution — assimilation). The judge must show that he is invested in his duties on a regular basis, observing legal requirements. It cannot be anyone, but exactly the one that the law designates, including in the field of competence or attribution, a more exact term for the administrative scope. 2nd. Legal reserve (article 5, of the CF). The act or conduct determining the process Dubai Email List must necessarily be defined as a punishable administrative or ethical infraction. The Code of Medical Ethics contains the duties and prohibitions that weigh on the doctor, whether in terms of his professional responsibility, in relation to human rights, to the patient and their families or in relationships with colleagues.
There must be an exercise in hermeneutics, fitting the fact within the regulatory norm capable of provoking a sanction. If the conduct is not considered punishable or reprehensible, there is no need to consider prosecution or trial. The third principle is the presumption of innocence (article 5, LVII). One should never start from the premise that the person being prosecuted is guilty, even if they have a prior record, as otherwise there is a serious risk of error. It is true that previous life may come to weigh on conviction, but this is only as a simple reinforcement of what is learned by the judge.
The Federal Constitution — assimilation). The judge must show that he is invested in his duties on a regular basis, observing legal requirements. It cannot be anyone, but exactly the one that the law designates, including in the field of competence or attribution, a more exact term for the administrative scope. 2nd. Legal reserve (article 5, of the CF). The act or conduct determining the process Dubai Email List must necessarily be defined as a punishable administrative or ethical infraction. The Code of Medical Ethics contains the duties and prohibitions that weigh on the doctor, whether in terms of his professional responsibility, in relation to human rights, to the patient and their families or in relationships with colleagues.
There must be an exercise in hermeneutics, fitting the fact within the regulatory norm capable of provoking a sanction. If the conduct is not considered punishable or reprehensible, there is no need to consider prosecution or trial. The third principle is the presumption of innocence (article 5, LVII). One should never start from the premise that the person being prosecuted is guilty, even if they have a prior record, as otherwise there is a serious risk of error. It is true that previous life may come to weigh on conviction, but this is only as a simple reinforcement of what is learned by the judge.